Animal Farm: George Orwell

I think ‘Animal Farm’ was written from the perspective of the common animal as a mountain of power litanies that lose their worth in the struggle for the Manor farm.

The allegory of a communistic world window opens our conscience to the lost importance of its message. The life it gives to the cause is in its portrayal of its characters. This is evident in its class struggle between the pigs and the other farm animals. The main moment of its inception was the internal world that was created by the pig’s lowly treatment they imposed on their comrades. It set up a system of minion inclusion that was never going to be equal in its moment of truth, but intentions start taking it’s longing to be more to a level never anticipated by the animals and humans. The pigs were in a maelstrom monopoly, more or less impotent of power that is made to do good rather than control.

I think power is the longing for change in a society that carries its principles to the extreme, lifting its values to the collective in an overpowering performance of majestic righteousness. It is a morally laconic miming of what becomes of an ideological movement when acting within a monopolised media or propaganda that takes the armistice left of the centre of its actual minion collective thought. It can’t acrimoniously intend to unite the animals, lifting their might to achieve their soul intention of winning the power to take the Manor farm and its spoils for themselves.

I misunderstood the sin opposed in internalised will locked in a soul that is in contention with its truth, that all will of the people is in sync to hear and resist the altered rules of a dictatorship. Resistance is futile when misunderstood messages are mistaken for gospel, such as the ‘seven commandments’ outlining a way of life. It serves to include all writing, omnipresent of meaning, withheld between its words of untruth.

It is the Orwellian fable in a mimicked, laconic ministerial moment reflecting the Communist Government of Russia in a time within the world war of Europe in Germany and England. The allies took a new ally in Russia that won the war on Germany. In a mutual agreement between Churchill and Stalin, they came to together to fight the Nazi’s. It was what was needed to stamp out lost weakness that was in a Socialist war of parties that winter could beat in cold conditions. Locking horns the two nationalistic countries came up against each other, mitigating ideals that contrast their propaganda machines, lost in a moment in the sun for Stalin who abandoned his world view to join Churchill and Roosevelt. It was like the pigs willingly giving up their ideals to join the humans and wage war on the animals in a systematic move that was not in the favor of their lowly comrades. It was in contrast a misunderstanding of reinvention, like the Russian people misunderstanding Stalin’s ‘song of war’ that Stalin could lift them up to withstand the Monarchy and make all lives equal. It was a lie that created further poverty in listless working class people.

I think the pigs took power to join the humans in order to gain acceptance as a viable force amongst the human farms. It is in light with Stalin and England and what both parties stand to gain as allies.